Your BevAlc company is leaving money on the table. Here’s where to find it.

It’s sitting in pallets of wine that won’t move for another six months. It’s hiding in the hours your team spends reconciling spreadsheets instead of making decisions. It’s walking out the door every time a distributor calls for a product you don't have on hand.

The harder question isn't whether you're leaving money on the table. It's how much, and where exactly it's going.

‍

The three cost drivers nobody tracks well

Here’s the thing about supply chain cost reduction in BevAlc: the biggest losses rarely show up as a single line item. They’re distributed across departments, buried in operational budgets, and easy to dismiss as "just the way things work." But when you add them up, the number is startling.

‍

1. Inventory you’re carrying but shouldn’t be

Inventory carrying cost is one of the most misunderstood numbers in our industry. Most finance teams know the warehouse rent line, but carrying costs go much further: insurance, depreciation, tied-up working capital, handling, shrinkage, and the opportunity cost of cash sitting on pallets instead of funding growth.

For beverage alcohol companies, carrying costs typically run 20-30% of total inventory value per year. If you’re holding $5 million in inventory and 15% of that is excess stock, you're spending $150,000-$225,000 annually to store products that shouldn't be there yet.

The root cause? Forecasting that can't keep up with your business. When your demand planning runs on spreadsheets or gut feel, the natural response is to over-order. Safety stock becomes "just in case" stock, and it compounds.

‍

2. Revenue lost to stockouts

Stockouts in beverage alcohol hit differently than in other industries. A missed retail order isn’t just a lost sale. It can mean lost shelf placement you spent months earning, a damaged relationship with a distributor who needed that product for a promotion, and marketing dollars wasted on campaigns pointing to products you can't deliver.

The ripple effect of a single stockout can be 3-5x the value of the immediate missed order. And most companies track stockout frequency without connecting it to the full downstream cost.

If you’re experiencing even a handful of significant stockouts per year, the cumulative revenue impact is likely far higher than you think.

‍

3. Time your team spends planning instead of deciding

This one is personal for a lot of operations teams. How many hours per month does your planning team spend pulling data from different systems, cleaning it up, building forecasts in Excel, and then reconciling those forecasts against actuals?

For many mid-size wine and spirits companies, the answer is 40-100+ hours per month across the team. At a loaded cost of $75/hour, that's $36,000-$90,000 per year in labor just to produce a forecast, not to act on one.

The real cost isn’t just the hours. It's what your team isn’t doing while they're stuck in spreadsheet mode: analyzing trends, adjusting strategy, working with sales to understand what’s actually happening in the market.

‍

Why these costs stay hidden

There's a reason most companies haven’t totaled this up. The information lives in different places. Inventory data is in one system, labor hours are tracked (or not tracked) somewhere else, and stockout costs require connecting sales, warehouse, and finance data that rarely lives together.

Nobody's job title is "quantify how much bad planning costs us." So the number just... doesn’t exist.

Until you calculate it.

‍

Putting real numbers to the problem

We built a BevAlc supply chain ROI calculator specifically for wine and spirits companies to answer this question. You enter a few details about your operation: case volume, SKU count, how you plan today, your team size, and current pain points. It runs the math against industry benchmarks from beverage alcohol companies and breaks down your estimated annual cost across all three areas.

It takes less than two minutes, and the output gives you something concrete: a number you can bring to your next budget conversation, your board meeting, or your team planning session.

If you’re a finance leader trying to evaluate technology investments (we see you, Rhys), this is the kind of quantified starting point that separates real conversations from wishful thinking.

If you’re an operations or supply chain leader building an internal business case, it gives you the ammunition you need to show leadership exactly where the savings are and how to prioritize them.

‍

The planning gap is fixable

The good news is that these aren't abstract, structural problems. They’re planning problems, and better demand planning and forecasting directly reduces all three cost drivers:

These aren’t theoretical improvements. They're what happens when you replace fragmented, manual planning with a system that actually understands how beverage alcohol supply chains work.